dc.contributor.author |
Hyland, ME |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-02-25T08:59:36Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-02-25T08:59:36Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2005 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Homeopathy Vol. 94 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://aohindia.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/91 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
For human trials using Quality of Life questionnaires, studies on the activity, content
and theoretical basis of homeopathic preparations were reviewed approximately 70%
of cases; more in children showed improvement. Homeopathy reduced costs and
allowed a better improvement in work-days lost compared with conventional practice.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) implicitly test the placebo hypothesis; RCTs have
been performed and meta-analyses conclude that there is clear evidence of efficacy
which cannot be attributed to placebo effect.
Priorities depend on the audience. More research is needed especially regarding the
content of homeopathic preparations and the transmission of information. Theoretical
issues are also important to avoid incorrect design of research protocols. More effort
should be dedicated to veterinary research. Clinical effects analysis in humans remains
important. Many other questions should be prioritised, such as the potential of
homeopathy to avoid invasive procedures in children and the long-term effects of
homeopathy in preventing chronic complications. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
CCRH |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Veterinary |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Effectiveness |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Methods |
en_US |
dc.title |
Priorities and methods for developing the evidence profile of homeopathy Recommendations of the ECH General Assembly and XVIII Symposium of GIRI |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |