DSpace Repository

Diagnosis part Two

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Moskowitz, Richard
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-15T11:10:58Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-15T11:10:58Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation American Journal of Homeopathic Medicine, Vol.102(1) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://aohindia.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2052
dc.description.abstract The problem with diagnosis centers on the distinction between illness, which features subjective elements (symptoms) and disease which is defined purely objectively. Diagnosis the identification of disease works very well to explain illness by situating it within the accumulated body of pathological knowledge. It works much less well as a predictor of illness in the future. Yet medical practice increasingly focuses on identifying and potential disease elements before the patient is aware of them. These data are inherently ambiguous and misleading both by identifying abnormalities which never materialize as illness (false negatives). Above all they are dangerous by inculcating fear reducing risk to a statistical calculation and promoting drastic irrelevant and injurious treatment to correct them. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Illness en_US
dc.subject Identification of disease en_US
dc.title Diagnosis part Two en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Digitised Articles
    A collection of digited articles from various journals susbcribed by CCRH Library.

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account