DSpace Repository

Homoeopathic treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: An open label randomised multicentric placebo‑controlled clinical trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sharma, Bindu
dc.contributor.author Mehra, Pritha
dc.contributor.author Oberai, Praveen
dc.contributor.author Roja, Varanasi
dc.contributor.author Reddy, G. R. C.
dc.contributor.author Arya, D. D.
dc.contributor.author Mohanan, P. G.
dc.contributor.author Padmanabhan, Maya
dc.contributor.author Manchanda, Raj K.
dc.contributor.author Kumar, B. S. J. Raja
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-11T06:37:42Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-11T06:37:42Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Indian Journal of Research In Homoeopathy Vol.12 (3) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://aohindia.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1846
dc.description.abstract Objectives: The objectives of the study are to evaluate the effectiveness of Homoeopathic Constitutional remedy (HC) and Homoeopathic Constitutional + Organ remedy (HCOM) in comparison to Placebo (PL) in cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), ultrasonographic changes in prostate volume, post‑void residual urine, uroflowmetry and in WHO Quality of Life (QOL)‑BREF. Materials and Methods: A multicentric, three‑armed, randomised clinical trial was conducted at five centres. Patients were enrolled following the pre‑defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, randomised into three groups in 2:2:1 ratio and were followed up for 6 months. The statistical analysis was done with modified intention‑to‑treat principle (mITT). Results: Out of 461 patients screened, 254 patients were enrolled in the study and 241 patients were analysed as per mITT. The mean changes in IPSS and QOL due to urinary symptoms from baseline to end of study had shown a positive trend in all the three groups. However, in HC group, the changes were more prominent as compared to the other two groups. There was no difference between HC and HCOM groups and they were equally effective in terms of managing lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH. With regard to secondary outcome, there was no difference between the groups. The psychological, social and environmental domains of WHOQOL‑BREF have shown positive trend, but there was no statistically significant difference in intervention groups. Conclusion: In this study, statistical significance was found in the IPSS in all the three groups but only in HC and not in any of the objective parameters. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship CCRH en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject International Prostate Symptom Score en_US
dc.subject Post‑void residual urine en_US
dc.subject Prostate volume en_US
dc.subject Uroflowmetry en_US
dc.title Homoeopathic treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: An open label randomised multicentric placebo‑controlled clinical trial en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account