DSpace Repository

Symptom prevalence in a cohort of 65 patients improved with the homoeopathic medicine Mangifera indica: A multicentric open observational clinical verification study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Manchanda, Raj K.
dc.contributor.author Chakraborty, Partha Sarathi
dc.contributor.author Singh, Pramodji
dc.contributor.author Rai, M.K.
dc.contributor.author Singh, Ojit
dc.contributor.author Singh, D.K.
dc.contributor.author Paul, Souradipta
dc.contributor.author Nayak, Chaturbhuja
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-05T11:57:03Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-05T11:57:03Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Indian Journal of Research In Homoeopathy Vol.11 (3) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://aohindia.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1740
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Clinical verifi cation is an ongoing research program of the Council that verifi ed many rare homoeopathic drugs. Aim: To clinically verify the ‘symptomatology’ of Mangifera indica by ascertaining the symptoms improved during verifi cation. Materials and Methods: The study was a multicentric open label observational trial. Total 114 patients were enrolled after matching with the available symptom compendium and eligibility criteria in fi ve centres of the Council. The medicine was prescribed in 6C, 30C, 200C and 1M potencies, as per need of the patient following the homoeopathic principles and protocol developed by the Council. The collected data were presented in terms of descriptive statistics. Prevalence of symptoms in the responding and non-responding population has been compared using Chi-square test. Results: Among the total 114 patients enrolled in the study, 77 patients who completed the follow up were analysed, as there were 37 drop out cases. The demographic analysis shows, male/female: 41/36, mean age 28.61 years. There was “clinical success” in 65 cases (84.41%) and failures in 12 cases (15.59%), judged subjectively by the physicians. A minimum of two prescriptions were considered for pick listing each symptom as a rule of thumb. Conclusions: Total 16 CCRH proving symptoms were verifi ed, 4 symptoms from other literatures were also verifi ed. 51 new clinical symptoms/symptom components were identifi ed. Further replication and estimation of likelihood ratio in general practice setting is crucial for confi rmation and inclusion of such symptoms in homoeopathic literatures. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship CCRH en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Cohort en_US
dc.subject Clinical verifi cation en_US
dc.subject Mangifera indica en_US
dc.subject Observational study en_US
dc.title Symptom prevalence in a cohort of 65 patients improved with the homoeopathic medicine Mangifera indica: A multicentric open observational clinical verification study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account