DSpace Repository

Formic acid: A multicentric observational homoeopathic clinical verification trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Manchanda, Rajkumar
dc.contributor.author Gupta, Jaya
dc.contributor.author Chakraborty, Parthasarathi
dc.contributor.author Singh, Pramodji
dc.contributor.author Singh Nayan, Surendra
dc.contributor.author Singh, J.P.
dc.contributor.author Pradhan, P.K.
dc.contributor.author Ramteke, Sunil
dc.contributor.author Das, K.C
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-05T10:13:37Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-05T10:13:37Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Indian Journal of Research In Homoeopathy Vol.10 (4) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://aohindia.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1714
dc.description.abstract Aims: This study was done to clinically verify the symptomatology of Formic acid by ascertaining the symptoms improved during verification and to incorporate new findings (if any) to the known symptomatology of Formic acid. Methods: A multicentric observational clinical verification study was conducted at nine research centers of Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy to verify the proving symptoms of rarely used medicine, Formic acid. Two hundred and seventy participants having symptomatological similarity with Formic acid were included and prescribed in 6C, 30C, 200C, and 1M potencies, as per need of each case. The data were compiled in a specially designed Excel spreadsheet for further analysis. The collected data were presented in terms of descriptive statistics. Prevalence of the symptoms in the responding and nonresponding population was compared using Chi‑square or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Out of 266 followed up patients, 215 cases responded (80.8%) with 95% confidence interval of 0.75–0.85. The number of symptoms verified was as follows: proving symptoms (n = 11) and new observations (n = 22). The widely emerged new general symptoms, i.e., clean tongue, disturbed sleep, loose stool, tastelessness, and profuse sweat may be worth consideration during prescription of Formic acid. Conclusions: The proving symptoms of Formic acid could be verified clinically, but the correlation of patient‑specific symptom needs cautious interpretation. Further replication on larger sample and estimation of likelihood ratio in real‑time clinical practice are needed. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship CCRH en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Arthritis en_US
dc.subject Clinical verification en_US
dc.subject Dyspepsia en_US
dc.subject Formic acid en_US
dc.title Formic acid: A multicentric observational homoeopathic clinical verification trial en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account