DSpace Repository

Effect of individualized homoeopathic treatment in influenza like illness: A multicenter, single blind, randomized, placebo controlled study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chakraborty, P.S.
dc.contributor.author Lamba, C.D.
dc.contributor.author Nayak, D.
dc.contributor.author John, M.D.
dc.contributor.author Sarkar, D.B
dc.contributor.author Poddar, Amitava
dc.contributor.author Arya, J.S.
dc.contributor.author Raju, K.
dc.contributor.author Prusty, A.K.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-04T06:04:04Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-04T06:04:04Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.citation Indian Journal of Research In Homoeopathy Vol.7 (1) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://aohindia.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1404
dc.description.abstract Background: In the past decade the upsurge of influenza throughout the globe was significant and in recent years this has resurfaced showing failures of all the preventive and therapeutic measures against it. Thus, this study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of homoeopathic medicines in the treatment of Influenza like illness (primary objective) and to compare the complication rate among patients receiving homoeopathic medication as compared to the patients receiving placebo and also to compare the efficacy of LM potency vis-à-vis Centesimal potency (secondary objective). Material and Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, triple arm placebo controlled trial conducted at nine Institutes and Units of Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy (CCRH) from June 2009 to December 2010. The patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomized to LM, Centesimal and Placebo groups. Homoeopathic interventions were given as per the principles of homoeopathy. Symptoms of Influenza like illness (ILI) were assessed as per validated scales. Data analysis was done using statistical package of SPSS 20.0 version. Each symptom was compared for 10 days among the allocated groups by using Kruskal wallis test and bonferroni correction for the multiple comparisons. Results: Out of 739 screened cases, 447 cases were eligible for enrolment comprising of LM (n=152), (n=147) and placebo (n=148) cases. There was a significant difference in temperature from 2nd day onwards in LM and Centesimal groups. The significant improvement was observed in headache and myalgia on 1st day in both the treatment groups. Likewise, significant improvement was noted in malaise on 2nd day in both the groups; sore throat on 1st day in LM and 2nd day in Centesimal; fatigue on 2nd day in LM and on 3rd day in Centesimal group; nasal complaints on 2nd day in LM and 1st day in Centesimal group; chill on 3rd day in LM group and 1st day in Centesimal group and in sweat on 1st day in the treatment groups. Cough improved significantly from 3rd day in both the groups. Conclusion: The study revealed the significant effect of individualized homoeopathic treatment in the patients suffering from ILI with no significant difference between LM and Centesimal groups. The complication/sequel rate was also significantly less in the intervention groups. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship CCRH en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Centesimal potency en_US
dc.subject Influenza like illness en_US
dc.subject LM potency en_US
dc.subject Placebo en_US
dc.subject Randomized trial en_US
dc.title Effect of individualized homoeopathic treatment in influenza like illness: A multicenter, single blind, randomized, placebo controlled study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account