Skip navigation




Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://aohindia.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/2052
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoskowitz, Richard-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-15T11:10:58Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-15T11:10:58Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Homeopathic Medicine, Vol.102(1)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://aohindia.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2052-
dc.description.abstractThe problem with diagnosis centers on the distinction between illness, which features subjective elements (symptoms) and disease which is defined purely objectively. Diagnosis the identification of disease works very well to explain illness by situating it within the accumulated body of pathological knowledge. It works much less well as a predictor of illness in the future. Yet medical practice increasingly focuses on identifying and potential disease elements before the patient is aware of them. These data are inherently ambiguous and misleading both by identifying abnormalities which never materialize as illness (false negatives). Above all they are dangerous by inculcating fear reducing risk to a statistical calculation and promoting drastic irrelevant and injurious treatment to correct them.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectIllnessen_US
dc.subjectIdentification of diseaseen_US
dc.titleDiagnosis part Twoen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Digitised Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
American Journal Of Homeopathic Medicine vol 102,Apr 2009,pp 56-60.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
Show simple item record


Items in Archive are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.