Bogus Bonninghausen: The fundamental flaw in 'Boger's Bonninghausen

Abstract

We herein describe the basic conceptual flaw in Boger's attempted integration of Bonninghausen's disparate works into a single volume Bonninghausen's characteristics and repertory and how this work confuses the application and misrepersents the intentions of Bonninghausen. We further illustrate the many discrepancies and even translation problems which together add to render this work both ill-conceived and unreliable.