Skip navigation




Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://aohindia.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/1659
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorManchanda, Raj K.-
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, P.S.-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Pramodji-
dc.contributor.authorNayan, S.S.-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Ojit-
dc.contributor.authorPradhan, P.K.-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, D.K.-
dc.contributor.authorSaha, Subhranil-
dc.contributor.authorKoley, Munmun-
dc.contributor.authorNayak, Chaturbhuja-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-05T08:15:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-05T08:15:31Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationIndian Journal of Research In Homoeopathy Vol.9 (4)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://aohindia.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1659-
dc.description.abstractContext: Clinical verification is an ongoing research program of the Council that verified many rare homoeopathic drugs. Aims: To clinically verify the symptomatology of Mygale lasiodora by ascertaining the symptoms improved during verification. Settings and Design: In this multicenter observational study, 166 patients were enrolled after matching with the available drug symptomatology and specified eligibility criteria. The medicine was prescribed in 6C, 30C, 200C, and 1M potencies, as per homoeopathic principles. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were presented in terms of descriptive statistics. Results: One sixty‑six cases were analyzed; male/female: 105/61; mean age 29.13 years. There were “clinical successes” in 104 cases and failures in 62, judged subjectively by the physicians. A minimum of two prescriptions was considered for pick‑listing each symptom as a rule of thumb. The number of symptoms verified was as follows: proving symptoms (n = 18), symptoms from other literature (n = 16), and new observations (n = 47). The data were presented as mean, standard deviations, N (%), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Conclusions: Total 34 available symptoms were verified, and 47 new symptoms were identified. Cautious interpretation is necessary. Further replication on larger sample and estimation of likelihood ratio, in general, practice settings in prospective Bayesian approach is necessary before inclusion of the symptoms in homoeopathic literature.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCCRHen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAcneen_US
dc.subjectClinical verificationen_US
dc.subjectDyspepsiaen_US
dc.subjectMygale lasiodoraen_US
dc.titleMygale lasiodora: A multicentric observational homoeopathic clinical verification studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Original Article 3.pdf761.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in Archive are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.