Skip navigation




Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://aohindia.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/1443
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOberai, Praveen-
dc.contributor.authorGopinadhan, S.-
dc.contributor.authorVaranasi, Roja-
dc.contributor.authorMishra, Alok-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Vikram-
dc.contributor.authorNayak, Chaturbhuja-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-04T07:11:26Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-04T07:11:26Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationIndian Journal of Research In Homoeopathy Vol.7 (4)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://aohindia.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1443-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the usefulness of individualised homoeopathic medicines in treatment of Attention Defi cit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Design: Randomised placebo-controlled single-blind pilot trial. Setting: Central Research Institute (Homoeopathy), Kottayam, Kerala, India from June 2009 to November 2011. Participants: Children aged 6-15 years meeting the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD. Interventions: A total of 61 patients (Homoeopathy = 30, placebo = 31) were randomised to receive either individualised homoeopathic medicine in fi fty millesimal (LM) potency or placebo for a period of one year. Outcome measures: Conner’s Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short (CPRS-R (S)), Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-SS), Clinical Global Impression- Improvement Scale (CGI-IS) and Academic performance. Results: A total of 54 patients (homoeopathy = 27, placebo = 27) were analysed under modifi ed intention to treat (ITT). All patients in homoeopathy group showed better outcome in baseline adjusted General Linear Model (GLM) repeated measures ANCOVA for oppositional, cognition problems, hyperactivity and ADHD Index (domains of CPRS-R (S)) and CGI-IS at T3, T6, T9 and T12 (P = 0.0001). The mean baseline-adjusted treatment difference between groups at month 12 from baseline for all individual outcome measures favoured homoeopathy group; Oppositional (−16.4, 95% CI – 20.5 to − 12.2, P = 0.0001), Cognition problems (−15.5, 95% CI − 19.2 to − 11.8, P = 0.0001), Hyperactivity (−20.6, 95% CI − 25.6 to − 15.4, P = 0.0001), ADHD I (−15.6, 95% CI − 19.5 to − 11.6, P = 0.0001), Academic performance 14.4%, 95% CI 8.3 to 20.5, P = 0.0001), CGISS (−1.6, 95% CI − 1.9 to − 1.2, P = 0.0001), CGIIS (−1.6, 95% CI − 2.3 to -0.9, P = 0.0001). Conclusion: This pilot study provides evidence to support the therapeutic effects of individualised homoeopathic medicines in ADHD children. However, the results need to be validated in multi-center randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCCRHen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAttention defi cit hyperactivity disorderen_US
dc.subjectFifty millesimalen_US
dc.subjectPlaceboen_US
dc.subjectRandomised clinical trialen_US
dc.titleHomoeopathic management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A randomised placebo-controlled pilot trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Original Article 2.pdf520.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in Archive are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.